LSAT Explanation PT 19, S2, Q11: Carl: Researchers who perform operations on

LSAT Question Stem

Debbie attempts to counter Carl's argument by 

Logical Reasoning Question Type

This is a Method of Reasoning question. 

Correct Answer

The correct answer to this question is B. 

LSAT Question Complete Explanation

In this LSAT problem, we have an argument between Carl and Debbie about pain protocols for humans and animals. Carl argues that if lawmakers were as concerned about humans as they are about animals, there would be pain protocols for humans too. This implies that lawmakers are less concerned about humans than animals. Debbie counters this argument by pointing out that humans can be informed about the pain they will experience and make their own decisions, making pain protocols unnecessary for them.

The question type for this problem is Method of Reasoning (MOR), and we are asked to identify how Debbie attempts to counter Carl's argument.

Now, let's analyze each answer choice:

a) Debbie does not show that any of Carl's claims are inaccurate; she simply presents a different perspective on the issue. So, this choice is incorrect.

b) Correct answer. Debbie points out a relevant difference between humans and animals, which challenges the analogy Carl uses to base his conclusion. Humans can understand and decide for themselves whether to undergo a situation involving pain, while animals cannot.

c) Debbie does not claim that Carl's argument is based on sentimentality. She focuses on the difference between humans and animals in terms of decision-making. This choice is incorrect.

d) Debbie does not draw an analogy to illustrate a flaw in Carl's argument. Instead, she undermines the analogy Carl uses by pointing out a relevant difference between humans and animals. So, this choice is incorrect.

e) Debbie does not offer a specific example to demonstrate that Carl's argument is based on a claim that can be neither confirmed nor disproved. She addresses the analogy between humans and animals and provides a general explanation of why pain protocols are unnecessary for humans. This choice is incorrect.

In conclusion, the correct answer is (b) - Debbie attempts to counter Carl's argument by pointing out a relevant difference to undermine an analogy on which Carl bases his conclusion.