LSAT Explanation PT 22, S2, Q2: Mayor of Outerville, a suburb of
LSAT Question Stem
The argument leads to the conclusion that
Logical Reasoning Question Type
This is a Main Conclusion question.
Correct Answer
The correct answer to this question is B.
LSAT Question Complete Explanation
This LSAT problem is a Main Conclusion question, which means we need to identify the main conclusion of the argument presented in the passage. Let's examine each answer choice in light of the passage.
Answer choice (A): The passage does mention that Outerville should attract more residents, but this is not the main conclusion of the argument. It is a premise that has already been agreed upon, and the mayor's argument is focused on the best strategy to achieve this goal.
Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. The mayor argues that renovating the train station is the best strategy for attracting more residents to Outerville. The premises provided in the passage support this conclusion, making it the main point of the argument.
Answer choice (C): Although the passage mentions that the number of jobs in Center City is increasing, it does not make a claim that residents of Outerville should specifically look for jobs there. This answer choice is not the main conclusion of the argument.
Answer choice (D): The mayor does mention that driving into Center City is becoming more expensive than train travel, but he does not explicitly claim that people should commute by train rather than driving. This point is used to support the main conclusion but is not the conclusion itself.
Answer choice (E): While the mayor's ultimate goal is to attract people who want to live where train travel is convenient and pleasant, the argument itself is focused on convincing Outerville residents to renovate the train station. Therefore, this answer choice is not the main conclusion of the argument.
In summary, the main conclusion of the argument is that the train station in Outerville should be renovated, as indicated by answer choice (B).