LSAT Explanation PT 38, S1, Q2: Last month OCF, Inc., announced what

LSAT Question Stem

The main point of the argument is that 

Logical Reasoning Question Type

This is a Main Conclusion question. 

Correct Answer

The correct answer to this question is C. 

LSAT Question Complete Explanation

This LSAT problem presents an argument in which the author is discussing the similarities between two adjustable computer workstations released by OCF, Inc. and ErgoTech. The question type for this problem is Main Conclusion, which means we need to identify the main point or conclusion that the author is trying to make in the argument.

Before we dive into the answer choices, let's briefly recap the argument. The author believes that the similarities between the two products are too fundamental to be mere coincidence, and provides several points to support this claim, such as their appearance, functionality, and the timing of their release.

Now, let's analyze each answer choice in detail:

a) The two products have many characteristics in common.

While this statement is true and is mentioned in the argument, it is not the main point that the author is trying to make. It is merely a premise or a piece of evidence that supports the main point.

b) ErgoTech must have copied the design of its new product from OCF's design.

This answer choice does not pass the Fact Test. The author does not specifically claim that ErgoTech copied OCF's design; it could be the other way around, or there could be another explanation for the similarities. This statement is not the main point of the argument.

c) The similarities between the two products are not coincidental.

This answer choice is the correct one because it is a paraphrase of the conclusion that the author reaches in the argument. The author believes that the similarities are too fundamental to be mere coincidence, and this statement captures that main point.

d) Product designers sometimes reach the same solution to a given problem without consulting each other.

This statement would actually undermine the argument, as it suggests that the similarities could be coincidental. It cannot be the main point of the argument.

e) New products that at first appear to be unique are sometimes simply variations of other products.

Although the author might agree with this statement, it does not capture the main point of the argument, which specifically addresses the similarities between the two named products and the conclusion that they are not coincidental.

In summary, the main point of the argument is that the similarities between the two products are not coincidental, which is best represented by answer choice (c).